Thursday, August 24, 2017

That’s two off my SpaceX list



A lot of people love SpaceX for the dream of Mars.  I’m not big on the “future of humanity is on Mars” thing, but I love SpaceX because my dreams of lunar colonies and asteroid mining will only remain dreams if we can’t get things off Earth.  And SpaceX is a less-expensive way to get things off Earth.  However, I do have a bit of a problem with SpaceX in that they seem to bite off more than they can chew.  For a while it was like, “I don’t care about your grand plans for Mars, I’m waiting for you to do this thing that you said you would do three years ago.” To that end, about a year ago I came up with a list of the things I was waiting for SpaceX to do.  There were four items, but as of today there are now only two.

Number Four, reuse a rocket

When the Falcon 9 first stage landed at Cape Canaveral on December 22, 2015, becoming the first rocket to put a payload into orbit and then land, I like most people was overjoyed at the engineering marvel.  However, once the dust settled I was like, “Okay, when are you going to relaunch it?” Because while landing a rocket is a fantastic feat, the real test would be if you could reuse it.  I mean, a reusable rocket is one that you can launch and land several times, not one you launch, land, then throw in the scrap heap.  So when a different landed booster took off for the second time on March 30, 2017, I was thrilled.  Having a rocket you can launch, land, refuel, and relaunch in days – maybe even hours – will truly open up space for … everything.  And that was a beautiful first step towards that.

Number Three, launch twelve times in a year

This may sound like an odd goal to have, but a few years ago I read somewhere that there were sixty satellites waiting to be launched by SpaceX over the next five years.  That’s great, but in 2013 they only had three launches, and in 2014 they had six.  To launch sixty satellites in five years, you need to average one a month, but if you’re only doing one every two or three months, the math doesn’t work out.  They seemed on track to meet this goal in 2015, but then they had a launch failure on June 28, which set them back.  So in 2015 they again only had six successful launches.  In 2016 they had eight successful launches in eight months, but then a rocket blew up on the pad on September 1, setting them back again.  But today, with the successful launch of FORMOSAT-5, SpaceX has launched twelve times this year.  And they still have four months to go. 

As I said, this is a little odd to have as a goal, but for my dreams of making humanity a spacefaring civilization, we need not overly expensive, reliable, and frequent launches to get us out into space.  SpaceX has done a lot with those first two, and it’s fantastic to see them make progress with the last.

Number Two, fly the Falcon Heavy

There are those who think the only way to open up space is to have super big rockets.  I don’t fall into that group.  My thoughts have been that if you had two rockets, let’s call them A and B where B can lift three times as much as A, I’d rather split a payload into thirds and launch them on three As and have them dock in orbit.  In large part because if there’s an accident, then you only lose a third of the payload instead of all of it.  Also, bigger rockets tend to be more expensive, take longer to design and test, and don’t fly as often.  If we were going to put up some space station that would take one SLS or ten Falcon 9s, I’d go with the Falcon 9s because you could probably fit an additional ten Falcon 9s into the launch manifest in the time before the SLS finally flies.  It’s the philosophy of “Let’s do what we can now with what we have, instead of waiting ten years to maybe do something bigger.”

Having said all of that, I do like the Falcon Heavy because it seemed like a pretty simple – in rocket science terms – idea.  As such, instead of waiting decades for a new big rocket, we’d only have to wait a couple of years.  And then a couple more.  And a couple more.  Given what I know now, I might not have been that big of fan of the Falcon Heavy when I first heard of it.  But it’s finally just a few months from flying.  Hopefully.  And if it’s actually successful, it will be a wonderful addition to the rocket family.  And while people will still clamor for something bigger, I’ll be “Let’s do what we can now with what we have, instead of waiting ten years to maybe do something bigger.” As far as I’m concerned, the Falcon Heavy is big enough to start working towards new space stations and lunar bases.

Number One, fly humans

While launching communication satellites and science probes are great, the only way to colonize space is to send people.  While SpaceX doesn’t have the only commercial crew launcher in development, it does seem like it’s the furthest ahead.  It also may be the most open to stuff beyond the International Space Station.  Taking crews to the ISS is important, but I think the whole point is to open up new places to take people.  SpaceX has already announced a joyride around the moon, and with the Falcon Heavy they can launch modules for commercial laboratories and hotels and then launch crews and guests to them. 

***

My dream of SpaceX has nothing to do with Mars.  It’s all about regular people – after going through a medical check and some training – booking a seat on the Tuesday launch up to Gagarin Hotel, or maybe to catch a connecting flight to land at the Armstrong Hotel.  And these four things have – and will – pave the way to that dream.

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

The good ol' days of the internet

One day when I was in college in the mid to late 90's, there was some presentation of some sort.  Before it started there were a couple of students and some professors talking about random things, and at one point the internet came up.  One guy said that you could search (this was before Google) for "volcanoes" and that the first two results would be about volcanoes, but that the third would be porn.

I remembered that today and I realized that now you could Google "volcanoes" and it's more likely that the third result would be some blog post about how volcanoes are some sort of alien mindgame to trick us into not thinking the Earth is flat, or some other such conspiracy bullshit.

I'm starting to miss the good ol' days when the internet was just some information and porn.

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Announcing the Stephen L. Thompson Lunar Exploration Prize



I am a big support of returning to the moon.  I even wrote an ebook about it tilted, “The Moon Before Mars: Why returning to the moon makes more sense than rushing off to Mars.” I also wrote a collection of short stories set on the moon – “A Cabin Under a Cloudy Sea and other stories” – as a way to help build interest, and I’m working on a second collection, “Travels Beyond Imagination,” to hopefully be out in early 2018.  But I’ve decided to take another step to help foster our return to the moon, and that’s to set up the Stephen L. Thompson Lunar Exploration Prize.

The Stephen L. Thompson Lunar Exploration Prize will award the next human – regardless of nationality – who walks on the moon $13.  And I’ll give them a certificate.  When it comes time to reward them, I’ll find some certificate template online and make one.  The $13 is symbolic of them being the thirteenth human – after Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, Pete Conrad, Alan Bean, Alan Shephard, Edgar Mitchell, David Scott, James Irwin, John Young, Charles Duke, Eugene Cernan, and Harrison Schmitt – to walk on the moon.  Now I know that compared to the budget of a moon mission $13 is … well, nothing, but the whole idea of this is the spirit of rewarding those who take us into the future.

Monday, July 17, 2017

Thoughts on the female Doctor



I’m okay with it.  And as long as they don’t overplay it, I’ll continue to be okay with it.  For example, if they’re smart, once she’s done regenerating she might touch her chest and say, “Well, that’s different,” but then shrug and go on with whatever the situation is.  And if she runs into anyone who says, “I thought you were a man,” and all she replies is, “People change.” If that’s all the attention they call to the fact, great.  As long as every episode isn’t “I am Woman, hear me roar,” as everyone bemoaning the death of Doctor Who assumes will happen, the show will continue. 

What will be interesting is if they do a story set in, say the 16th century, but instead of the people listening to what this Doctor has to say they just dismiss this odd woman.  So there is chance for social commentary.