As a moon firster who sees returning to the moon as the first step to making humanity a spacefaring civilization, I must be thrilled with the … possibly soon launch of the SLS. Right? Well, I’ve always been lukewarm towards the Artemis Program. And I think the main reason is the SLS. Don’t get me wrong, the SLS is a fantastic, gorgeous rocket and everyone who worked on it should be proud, and I do have the primal “Big Rocket Cool” feeling. But I think the SLS is the wrong way to get to where I want humanity to go.
They say that the
SLS will send the next person to the moon, which is nice, but I don’t want just
a couple of people bouncing around on the moon.
I want a permanently crewed base which grows into a colony. Yes, being alive when people are on the moon
will be great, but I’d much rather be alive when the first human is born on the
moon. And this one mission every year –
maybe – doesn’t seem to be the best way to go about that.
Over the last decade
or so, my view of big rockets has dimmed.
Yes, “Big Rocket Cool,” but I’ve started thinking that we could probably
achieve more using the “small” rockets we have than waiting years, or decades,
for the big rockets. Like, it’s tough accurately
comparing rockets with how much they can launch and at what price, but let’s
say the SLS will launch 10X what a Falcon 9 can launch. But for the price of one SLS, you could
probably buy two or three Falcon 9s and launch each of them ten or fifteen
times. Even if you just launch one
Falcon 9 a month, you could easily get more mass into space in the year(s)
between SLS launches.
No comments:
Post a Comment