I don’t really care.
Don’t get me wrong,
Starship is a technological marvel and all the engineers and technicians who
worked on it should be applauded. My
issue with it is just burnout from waiting.
I know designing rockets is hard, but I’m just tired of hearing about
some great rocket that “should fly next year,” only to wait five or six years
before it finally flies.
In the rocket
community, you’ll often hear about “Paper Rockets.” These are rockets that are
designed, but for one reason or another – they often can’t raise the money –
are never built and remain designs on paper.
Starship is not a paper rocket, but it’s in a second category of “Built But
Not Flown Rockets.” Once it does fly, it will move into a third category that I
call “Promise Rockets.” A lot of people will be passing out from excitement
when Starship launches, but I’ll be like, “Yes, that’s nice, but can it
actually fulfill all the promises made about it?” I won’t become excited until
Starship moves into the fourth category of “Functional Rockets.” This will
happen once it starts regularly carrying cargo to space. What exactly that point is, I don’t
know. Probably something like ten, fully
successful missions launched within a year.
Once that happens, I’ll be overjoyed with Starship.
For a bit of
clarification, I consider the Falcon 9 a Functional Rocket, but the Falcon
Heavy is still a Promise Rocket. (As of
this posting, it has flown five times in just over five years. If it ever flies six times in a year, I’ll consider
it Functional.) Other Functional Rockets
are the Atlas V, the Ariane 5, the H-IIA, etc.
They don’t fly six or ten times a year, but they weren’t built to do
that. I guess in that sense, the SLS is
also a functional rocket, since they only promised to fly it once every year or
so, but it’s not a rocket I care for.
So I hope they get all the data they need from this test flight, and that they quickly turn this built rocket into a Functional Rocket. But until they do, I won’t get too excited.
No comments:
Post a Comment