I know nothing about comic book Iron Fist. But I was excited for the Iron Fist series because I'm a fan of Daredevil and Jessica Jones. I guess I'm neutral towards Luke Cage. Then I started seeing all the posts with titles like: Iron Fist is a mess, and Marvel flubs Iron Fist and stuff like that. But I'm trying my best to keep an open mind. I'm six episodes in, and hope to finish the series in the next day or two.
So what are my thoughts six episodes in? I'm starting to get a bit worried. On one hand I have a bunch of questions like why did Danny leave K'un Lun and did he really think he could just walk back into Rand and do ... whatever. Normally, I'd think they would answer those in the second half, but with all the reports of the show being a mess, an easy way to really screw things up is to not give an insight to the motivations of the main character.
Also, did Claire lose Matt's phone number? Okay, so Danny has to go fight the duel by himself, but when Claire and Colleen take the guy to the hospital, you'd think she'd go, "Hey, I know a guy that can help us." Of course if Matt came in, he'd tell them all that they are going to get themselves killed because they don't know what they're doing, and Danny would tell him that only he can fight the Hand, and then the two would fight until they realized they both had skills and would team up. But if they did that, then Daredevil would probably overshadow Iron Fist in his own series, which is why I'm assuming that Claire lost Matt's number.
But it makes me think that if I was plotting out this series, I'd show Claire training with Colleen and meeting Danny in passing. She wouldn't learn about the Iron Fist until late in the series, so that she could figure out that some problems require more than one hero. It's what I'd do because it makes sense, so it makes me worried about what the show is doing. Of all the characters in the Marvel Netflix SubUniverse, Claire is easily in my top ten favorites, so seeing her being a bit thick is annoying.
After six episodes, I'd say I'm neutral, but worried about Iron Fist. We'll have to see how things go in the next seven episodes.
Monday, March 20, 2017
Tuesday, February 28, 2017
Thoughts on SpaceX’s moon plan
When
I saw that Elon Musk was going to make an announcement yesterday afternoon, I –
like everyone – wondered what it could be.
I figured the best I could hope for was that he would announce that
SpaceX and Bigelow Aerospace had signed a contract to launch an expandable
module to be either a private space station or a space hotel in 2019, or
so. But I figured it was more likely
some Mars-based project they were working on since, while I love SpaceX, they
do seem to be – in my opinion – overly focused on Mars.
I
had to go to work, so it wasn’t until late last night that I got home and
remembered to look up what the big announcement was. In case you don’t know (then why are you
reading this?) SpaceX plans to launch one of their Dragon 2 capsules on one of
their Falcon Heavy rockets next year.
Onboard will be two people who will spend about a week in space. Instead of just flying around the Earth, they
will fly out to the moon, go around the back – letting them look down on the
Farside of the Moon – before returning to Earth.
I
was happily surprised by that announcement.
As the author of “The Moon Before Mars: Why returning to the moon makesmore sense than rushing off to Mars” I support all endeavors that refocus
attention on the moon. That’s why I love
the Google Lunar X Prize and Unite Launch Alliance’s CisLunar-1000 idea. For decades it seems that all the public has
heard is “Mars Mars Mars,” so this is a great way to remind people that the
moon exists and we can go there now.
However,
while I hope everything about this works out as planned, I do have some cynical
thoughts on the matter. First off,
SpaceX and deadlines don’t always go together.
Hell, even the announcement of this was half-an-hour late. So while they’re saying this will go off in
late 2018, I’d say that mid-2019 is a far more likely earliest time this could
happen.
More
serious is I have to wonder if this is a new service SpaceX will offer – flying
two or three groups around the moon every year – or if it’s just a one-time
stunt. Possible reasons for such a stunt
would be that just a couple weeks ago they announced a delay in the Red Dragon
mission, which was to land an uncrewed Dragon capsule on Mars. It was supposed to go in 2018, but they wouldn’t
be ready so the first launch has slipped to 2020. (Due to their orbits, there’s a best case
launch window between Earth and Mars about every twenty-six months.) Could this
sudden announcement to fly by the moon be a way to say, “Don’t worry, we’re
still planning amazing things!”?
Another
possible reason for a stunt is the rise of suborbital space tourism. Last year Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic made
progress in their plans on sending tourists into space to experience a few
minutes of microgravity. If their
testing continues to go well, they might begin test flights this year and start
carrying passengers next. Could SpaceX’s
plan be a … dickish way of saying, “Yeah, they can get you into space for five
minutes, but we can get you into space for a week and send you around the moon”?
In
the end, what really matters is what actually happens. For every space venture that actually lifts
off, there have been a few thousand that never got passed the planning
stage. Hell, the Russians have been
talking about a similar mission of sending people around the moon for like a
decade now, but nothing seems to have come of it. But I wish SpaceX, as well as United Launch
Alliance, Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic, Bigelow Aerospace, and the hundreds of
other space businesses all the success.
To be frank, I’m starting to get tired waiting for the world they will
build.
Wednesday, February 15, 2017
What too few seem to understand about fossil fuels
Recently,
I had a bit of back-and-forth with a couple of guys on Facebook about fossil
fuels vs. solar. I didn’t think of this
analogy at the time, but they seemed to put all our energy eggs into one basket
of fossil fuels and nuclear. When I
suggested diversifying our energy sources by moving one egg over to solar
energy, they treated me like a raving lunatic for even suggesting such blasphemy. They started talking about that being a waste
of resources, as if all the bricks and steel and money would be piled in the
desert as some sort of modern art sculpture instead of building a power plant
that would produce electricity indistinguishable from that produced by a coal
or nuclear power plant. I’m sure they
thought they had a point, I just don’t know what it was. I stopped replying because it was getting
into the “arguing with idiots” area and one sort of hinted that since I didn’t
share his belief in the glorious future of fossil fuels, I must be a
socialist.
In
reality, I’m a realist. For example, I
know that Earth is finite, meaning there is a finite supply of oil, coal, and
natural gas that we are rapidly burning through. (Yes, there are some geological processes
that are making more, but for every new barrel of oil the Earth makes we
probably burn a few tens of billions.) This
means that – if nothing changes – there are only two possibilities. The first is we squeeze every last bit of
oil, coal, or gas from the ground. The
second is that there is still some left, but it is so deep or in such hard to
reach locations that we can’t extract it at any profit. Which means that at that point in time, even
Ayn Rand would need to convert to a non-fossil fuel energy system.
The
Age of Fossil Fuels will end. There are
no ifs, ands, or buts about that. There
are only two questions: when will it happen, and will humans be smart enough to
move over to an alternate power source before then. Because if we run out of fossil fuels or they
stop being economically viable before we have an alternative, that will lead to
a mad scramble. Economically, mad
scrambles tend to be rather expensive, and socially they can be violent. Common sense would seem to indicate trying to
avoid them.
How
do we avoid the mad scramble when fossil fuels run out? By starting to build the alternative energy
infrastructure now. Every day we hem and
haw or say things like “There’s enough oil for fifty years, that means we don’t
have to worry about running out for forty-nine years,” we get a day closer to
the economy ruining, bloody scrambling, human civilization ending(?) moment our
children, or our children’s children run out of fossil fuels. And I’m sure they will be proud their
ancestors didn’t “waste” resources building something silly like a solar power
station.
Friday, January 20, 2017
I never thought I’d see this day
I never thought I’d see Obama handing off
to the next President. Not because I’m a
conspiracy nut who thought that Obama was going to rip up the Constitution and
declare himself King, but because when he was elected in 2008 I thought there
was a 99% chance that he’d be assassinated in his first year. I did not expect him to live through his
first term, let alone a second. I don’t
know if it was because the Secret Service did such a good job protecting him,
or if the anti-Obama people were just talk.
I wonder if the Secret Service kept a list of idiots who threatened
Obama just so they’d sound tough to the other anti-Obama people. I also wonder if there were bars that would
give people a free drink if they were investigated by the Secret Service for
tweeting “death to Obama” or something.
I really started thinking about this four
years ago when Obama’s first term ended, but I didn’t want to say anything at
the time for fear of giving people ideas.
And I’ve been thinking about it a lot lately because, well, it’s the end
of his second term, but also because my feeling of certainty that Obama would
be assassinated is matched by my feeling of certainty that Trump will be impeached.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)